Sunday, April 27, 2014
To all you republicans that helped me win, I sincerely like to thank you, 'cause now I got the world swingin' from my nuts, and damn it feels good to be a ranchsta
So about Cliven Bundy--the rancher who's enraged at the thought that he should be required to pay fees for grazing his cattle on public land 'cause FREEDUMB IZNT FREE and oh by the way don't you think those negroes were better off as slaves?--it really amazes me that…well, okay, obviously, it doesn't actually amaze me, but it is striking just how much it puts everything into stark relief. Let's say that your tea party types are actually sincere and principled in their belief that there should be no social safety net. It would be monstrous, but at least it would be principled, for however much you think that's worth. But it isn't, is it? As you can see if you visit the official tea party website, which I am not linking to, they are hella supportive of these Bundy lunatics, meaning: they're actually all in favor of absurdly generous federal subsidies, as long as they're going to rich people. No, they quite explicitly support slashing public aid for poor people, and only for poor people. This puts us in a position that is well beyond monstrous. My brother, for his MA, is doing a project that involves trying to understand conservatives and sketch out a way in which they can come into genuine conversation with liberals, since that obviously isn't happening right now. Which is all very idealistic and all, but I say, good luck with that.
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Felix Gilman, The Revolutions (2014)
The year is 1895. Arthur Shaw is a struggling writer. He meets Josephine Bradman, and they get engaged. Josephine does typing and translation work for various eccentric spiritualist types, and it's through this work that Arthur becomes involved with one such group that is trying to astrally project themselves into space--into different "spheres," as the cosmology would have it. This is all part of a sort of spiritual arms race, as it comes out that these spiritualists are involved in a subrosa magical war with various others.
Friday, April 18, 2014
Gabriel García Márquez
One Hundred Years of Solitude left me gasping for air when I finished it. A rare experience. I can't help feeling as though afterwards García Márquez struggled to re-attain that level and never quite managed it (which isn't to say that his later books don't have merit), but One Hundred Years of Solitude is a singular experience. It's one of those books that you might feel sort of leery about without having read because it's the sort that's always recommended by teachers, and then the whole Oprah's Book Club thing--but it really is that good. My other favorites are the novellas "No One Writes to the Colonel" and "Chronicle of a Death Foretold."
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
What happens when you try to read The Onion in Indonesia?
This happens:
I don't object to the ironic xenophobia on the basis that it's per se offensive, though I do object to it on the grounds that it's lazy and not funny; the Onion at its best is capable of being WAY more offensive and WAY more funny than this. But really, that's neither here nor there. What I really object to is the rather obvious way that they're using this weak-ass comedy to self-consciously try to deflect attention from the fact that, what the fuck, seriously, you want MONEY from me? It's not even that the money itself would be a big deal (though that "$0.99 for the first month" does look ominous); it's that I do not like that they are attempting to gull me in such a clumsy, unsubtle way (and that "help" button doesn't clarify anything; it just goes to a generic online-publication-login site that the Onion is using). If you want me to pay money, please provide an explanation of why you think this is reasonable. There is a very high chance that I will respond by saying, no, fuck you, that's bullshit, but at least I won't resent you and refuse to subscribe in principle, the way I do now.
I don't object to the ironic xenophobia on the basis that it's per se offensive, though I do object to it on the grounds that it's lazy and not funny; the Onion at its best is capable of being WAY more offensive and WAY more funny than this. But really, that's neither here nor there. What I really object to is the rather obvious way that they're using this weak-ass comedy to self-consciously try to deflect attention from the fact that, what the fuck, seriously, you want MONEY from me? It's not even that the money itself would be a big deal (though that "$0.99 for the first month" does look ominous); it's that I do not like that they are attempting to gull me in such a clumsy, unsubtle way (and that "help" button doesn't clarify anything; it just goes to a generic online-publication-login site that the Onion is using). If you want me to pay money, please provide an explanation of why you think this is reasonable. There is a very high chance that I will respond by saying, no, fuck you, that's bullshit, but at least I won't resent you and refuse to subscribe in principle, the way I do now.
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Pointless Dreams lead to Pointless Posts!
I had this ridiculously lame dream where I was planning a blog post where I would list all the direct quotes in Smiths songs. Riveting! I think I must've had this because quotes and indirect quotes were active in my brain from teaching. Anyway, it was inevitable that this dumb dream-post would become reality. The criterion is "direct quote that is definitively attributed to someone other than Morrissey himself." There are a fair few bits where he quotes himself, but if you start down that road, you seriously won't know where to stop. Slippery slope, people. Like box turtle marriage.
Anyway, pointless compendium after the link. Not that I've done research or anything, but I really do get the impression that they did this a lot more than most other bands. Is that why my subconscious dredged it up? The thought has certainly never consciously occurred to me.
Sunday, April 06, 2014
Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, The Ingenious Gentleman Don Quixote of La Mancha (1605 & 1615; trans. John Ormsby, 1885)
Okay, so there's probably not a whole lot I can say to shine any additional light on a novel like Don Quixote, but hey, I read it, and I wanted to make that fact known. I'm trying to fill in some of the more notable holes in my literary education, of which this book was possibly the biggest. A lot of people (NB: I'm restricting my comments to the Anglosphere here) know the basic concept, but not too many know about in any depth. How many people can name an episode from the book other than "tilting at windmills?" I sure couldn't have before picking it up.
Friday, April 04, 2014
Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014)
I have to put my foot down: the action sequences in Captain America: The Winter Soldier are really notably badly edited. I mean, I don't know, maybe I'm just noticing it more this time out, though I don't know why that would be, but I really have the feeling that the problem is greater here than in previous Marvel movies. The camera is constantly cutting and flipping all over the place, and this oft makes it way more difficult to follow the action than it ought to be.
In light of which it seems weird to say that Captain America: The Winter Soldier is really great fun--one of the best in the whole extended series. The whole paranoid, conspiracy-thriller aspect of the story is something that's entirely new to the franchise, and it works really well. A scene of building tension as more and more people crowd onto an elevator at different floors is extremely well-done (even if one wishes the denouement had been a bit less obvious). The other big winner, for me, was a chase scene with Nick Fury--in previous movies, Samuel L Jackson's character had been basically above the fray, never in any actual danger, so it was actually kind of shocking, in an exciting way.
And what the hell--I really like The Captain himself. It's odd that such a corny character could be brought to the screen so well, but I think he's one of my favorite characters in the franchise, topped only by Mark Ruffalo's incarnation of Bruce Banner, and maybe Loki. Good characters, good story, good laugh-lines--what more do you want? Well, okay, yes, less choppy action, but the best action scenes nonetheless work in spite of themselves. I'm happy with this one.
I also appreciated the swipes it took at the modern security state--no, they're not the most coherent or biting, but hey, for a movie of this sort, they're okay. Certainly a lot better than the frankly laughable effort at same in The Dark Knight. But here's the real question: if you're a wingnut, do you hate the movie because it suggests that immediately murdering every terrorist or potential terrorist ever is a bad idea, so it must be pro-Obama, who, as we know, Coddles Terrorists…or do you love it because right now Obama's in charge so you can blame all our security overreach on him and pretend like you've always had a problem with it, and by extension read the movie as anti-Obama? It's a tough one. What a tragic life does the Zhadovite lead! On consideration, though, I'm afraid the presence of Robert Redford in the movie is quite likely to tip the scales in favor of "hate." Bit of a pain to hate all media that you can't obviously co-opt, I should think.