More addlepated letters page theology!
...and how.
Dr. Farouk Georgy [bomb-thrower who frequently and futilely writes left-wing letters to the editor] gives a solid definition of liberal. Being known as a liberal used to be a good thing.
However, the liberals of today have changed the definition as the Lord said would happen.
"The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the Lord, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right. But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand." (Isaiah 32:5-8 KJV)
As you can see, it is today that the vile person is called liberal. However, at the time of Christ's return, the vile person will no longer be called liberal and liberal will be applied to the people it was originally intended for. The ones now known as conservatives.
Yes indeed. Of course, the King James Version is the ONLY one that uses the word "liberal" here. But hey--if there's a good reason why the language of a seventeenth-century translation of a thousands-of-years-old text shouldn't directly correspond with twenty-first-century political terminology, I'd like to hear it!
Dr. Farouk Georgy [bomb-thrower who frequently and futilely writes left-wing letters to the editor] gives a solid definition of liberal. Being known as a liberal used to be a good thing.
However, the liberals of today have changed the definition as the Lord said would happen.
"The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the Lord, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right. But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand." (Isaiah 32:5-8 KJV)
As you can see, it is today that the vile person is called liberal. However, at the time of Christ's return, the vile person will no longer be called liberal and liberal will be applied to the people it was originally intended for. The ones now known as conservatives.
Yes indeed. Of course, the King James Version is the ONLY one that uses the word "liberal" here. But hey--if there's a good reason why the language of a seventeenth-century translation of a thousands-of-years-old text shouldn't directly correspond with twenty-first-century political terminology, I'd like to hear it!
posted by GeoX, one of the GeoX boys. at 5:38 PM
I moved my family here (WMPT) from NJ for a better life for my children. What a mistake I made. It was so sad to discover the bigotry, racism and prejudice against all, just as ripe as it was in the 1960's. Thank you for your letters, they show me that there are some decent people living here...even if (like many other local people), we are afraid to voice our opinions out loud.
My husband (army MSG. ret.) was one of the first to be called to W's "oil war." W knew within 6 months of the troops being in Iraq that there were no weapons of M.D.
The local rag (wmpt. sun-gazette) did a front page aricle on the invertabrate who was supposed to be my husbands superior in Iraq. My husband nearly vomitted when he read it! That coward sat in his tent in Kuwait crying on the side of his bed, he was AFRAID to go into Iraq. They did a front page article on that piece of dung!!! That's outrageous, we are not. It pay to be friends with the editor!