Tatyana Tolstaya, The Slynx (2000)
Here we have a totally wild
post-apocalyptic dystopian satire allegory thing by (I think) a great
grand-niece of Leo Tolstoy. The nuclear war happened some
indeterminate hundreds of years ago, and now people are living a
primitive, medieval (pre-medieval in some ways) lifestyle. There's a
lot that's disorienting and alarming about this world, as obliquely
revealed in bits and pieces. Take this, from the beginning:
Black rabbits flitted from
treetop to treetop.
Huh? Flying rabbits?
It would be nice to have the
meat...
Okay, makes sense...
Give black rabbit meat a good
soaking, bring it to boil seven times, set it in the sun for a week
or two, then steam it in the oven--and it won't kill you.
?!?! Mammals aren't supposed to kill
you like that. It shows, startlingly, a world out of joint. There's
a lot like this--things are weird and inexplicably deadly. I once
read an observation that Adam
Roberts made somewhere to the effect that one thing that
scares us about nuclear weapons is the idea of being poisoned by
light--poison is supposed to be a dark, dank, underground kind of
thing. It bends against how we see the world, and that's alarming.
I think you get a similar thing here. There's a lot more like this.
Mostly, people just eat mice, flavored
with worms. Delish. Quite apart from their diet and the physical
dangers around them, their existences are...somehow, one feels
vaguely racist saying "brutish," but given that race plays
no factor in the novel, I'll say it anyway. They laugh at suffering
inflicted on others; they rob one another at the slightest
opportunity and accept that this is just normal, expected behavior;
they are just generally carelessly cruel.
Our protagonist in this world is one
Benedikt. For someone living in this setting, he's fairly
intelligent, and he has the rare advantage of having no obvious
mutations ("Consequences"). He has a job copying
manuscripts, which come from a remote authority figure, who
attributes all texts (which are in fact a heterogeneous mixture of
real-world books and stories--there are many literary references in
The Slynx) to himself. The novel is written in a
very loose, free-wheeling way--I cannot, of course, speak with any
authority to how faithfully the translation captures the original,
but it certainly FEELS impressive. It's in the third person, but
frequently it wheels around to a kind of second person, as Benedikt
contemplates what "you" do in a given situation.
It's set up as a Bildungsroman; you
expect Benedikt to achieve some kind of enlightenment and rise above
his surroundings. What happens...well, that would be telling, but
Tolstoya's perspective certainly isn't an optimistic one. It turns
out there ARE, in fact, well-to-do people who treasure the knowledge
and aesthetic achievements of the past as contained in books--but it
quickly becomes apparent that these same people are actually
incredibly stupid, with no understanding at all of its significance
even as they pontificate about "art" while brutally and
hypocritically protecting the books from the hoi polloi. They're no
better than anyone else; they may talk about
progress and moving forward, but their "future" is really
no better--or even materially different--from the present. The only
people who do have a more sophisticated
understanding of the world are "oldeners," people who
survived the nuclear blast some hundred years ago even as it somehow
messed with their genes so as to stop the aging process--but they're
not about to restore the world either; they just get bogged down in
comically irrelevant arguments about ideology, and they don't make
any kind of serious effort to educate the rest of the populace. I
may possibly detect some sort of allegory on the theme of Russian
communism here.
Oh, and what's a slynx? It's a
mythical creature believed to stalk the forests and destroy anyone
who ventures there, but it comes to represent more what Donald
Rumsfeld might call the unknown unknowns--we're being held back but
we don't know that we're being held back or what's doing it or what
it is we're being held back from.
It's not a super-cheerful novel, but
it's shot through with dark humor, and Tolstoya's prose (or this
English approximation thereof) is sufficiently exhilarating that it
never feels dispiriting. I recommend it, though probably not for
kids of all ages.