Marcel Proust, Swann's Way (1913)
Oh, yes. We are doing
this, motherfucker.
You really have to make a conscious
effort to decide to read Proust. It is unlikely that you will just
wake up one fine day and casually think, you know what I want to do?
Read thirty-five hundred pages of navel-gazing by a neurotic
Frenchman. But you've gotta do it! What are you, some kind of
jerk?
In the first section, “Combray,”
the narrator talks at length about his childhood and his family. It
contains the two things that people who haven't read Proust may
nonetheless be vaguely aware of: a lengthy novel-opening treatise on
going to sleep, and, of course, sense-memory with madeleines. It
lets you know pretty much exactly what you're in for: pages on pages
of very intense probing of internalized mental states. The novelist
it reminds me most of—although, obviously, Proust came first—is
Mishima, in his more relentlessly internal novels like Confessions
of a Mask or Temple of the Golden Pavilion.
One thing I noticed is that, for all its emphasis on exactitude, I
wouldn't exactly call his characters “realistic,” or if so, then
realistic in a kind of heightened, stylized way, if that's not a
contradiction. Which it clearly is. But so for instance: the family
eats lunch an hour late on Saturday. Hokay. And, we are told, if
anyone asks, hey, why are you still eating? they'd be like DUH IT'S
SATURDAY and that would be the cause for much violent merriment, that
barbaric foreigners would wonder about such a thing, and you think,
okay, families have their weird little in-things, granted, but this
just makes them seem pathological rather than typical. I am not
going to drag in Lukács here, even though that's an obvious thing to
do, because I do not want to go down that rabbit hole. And anyway,
it's not a complaint. Young Marcel (or whatever we want to call
him)'s perceptions remain fascinating, and there certainly is
a lot of verisimilitude here, even if it's of an idiosyncratic kind.
The second part is “Swann in Love,”
Swann being a character who had frequently been invited to the
narrator's family's get-togethers in “Combray”--though without
his wife and daughter, who were considered low-class. Now, we hie
ourselves back to a past (of which the narrator couldn't possibly be
aware, but that's neither here nor there) in which Swann is not
married, but in the process of answering in the affirmative that
age-old question: ever
fallen in love with someone you shouldn't've?
Odette, his
future wife, is a possibly-former prostitute, for whom he conceives
an exhaustingly intense (“intense”--that word tends to come up a
lot when talking about Proust, I notice. “Exhausting,” also.)
and anguished passion, which is what the section is mostly about
(though there's also, relatedly, some quite withering scorn heaped on
the stifling triteness and artificiality of insular social
in-groups). It makes Swann look kind of insane, but in a relatable
way (well, relatable to me, anyway), which frequent moments when you
think, ouch—that is altogether too accurate. At the end of the
section, their relationship (such as it is) appears to be dead,
leaving open the question of how the hell they ended up married. No
doubt we will learn the answer to that question at a later point, in
very great detail!
The short concluding section, “Place
Names-The Name,” returns us to the narrator's childhood, and
particularly the way that hearing the names of places conjures
certain images of them that the places themselves can never match.
He also becomes friends with a young girl named Gilberte, who, we
later learn, is Swann's and Odette's daughter. His passion for her,
though basically presexual, still has that feel about it, and
mirror's Swann's feelings for Odette in a number of ways—though
when we're talking about children, it's more endearing than
disturbing.
So anyway, okay! Swann's
Way! Look, it must be admitted: Proust's merits are
obvious, but he's also pretty doggone exhausting. One would not call
him a disciplined writer. Still, in for a penny, in for a whole
shitload of penetrating social and psychological analysis! Stick
around to see if I make it all the way through!