E.R. Eddison, The Worm Ouroboros (1922)
This had been on the to-read list for a
long time, so when I accidentally opened it while I was going through
my ereader trying to decide what was next, I just shrugged and
started reading.
It's an early fantasy novel, as you may
know. It takes place on the planet Mercury, allegedly, though the
narrative frequently refers to “earth” or things being “earthly.”
There are two main lands: Demonland and Witchland (there are also
some other “lands” that don't play much of a role: Goblinland,
Impland, Pixyland). In spite of their names, it appears—it's sort
of difficult to tell with absolute certainty—that regardless of
landedness, all the characters are just humans.
As our story kicks off, the
demons...well, actually, as our story REALLY kicks off, we get this
inexplicable framing device where a guy on Earth named Lessingham
with a whole implied backstory is spirited away in his dreams to
witness things on Mercury. I found this kind of intriguing and was
curious about what would come of this...and the answer is NOTHING,
because after the first chapter he just vanishes
from the novel and we learn nothing more about him nor what the point
of that was. It's bizarre. I suppose if I HAD to hazard an
explanation, I would guess that, fantasy not really being a
well-established thing at the time, Eddison felt the need to situate
his story in SOME sort of relationship with the real world. But even
in that case, why imply story elements that you're then just going to
totally disregard? VERY STRANGE.
So ANYWAY, after that, things begin
with an emissary from Witchland coming to Demonland and saying, hey,
you demons need to recognize us as your masters. The demons
disagree, and all parties agree to a wrestling match between the
lands' respective rulers to determine whether this will happen. The
witch king is killed, which should mean that the witches will lay
off, but instead they break the oath and summon the Ouroboros of the
title to kidnap one of the demon lords and fuck up their fleet, and
from there it is ON. All of this is written in a self-consciously
archaic style, though not as irritatingly so as in The Wood
Beyond the World. Actually, interestingly enough,
two self-consciously archaic styles, as the novel
gets even more old-school when characters write letters, as they do
not infrequently. When that happens, we switch to what appears to be
an Elizabethan-ish spelling system (although, while not being an
Elizabethan expert and therefore not able to say for sure, I kinda
think it isn't particularly authentic).
The Worm Ouroboros
has some rather evocative landscape descriptions, and a few places
where it even gets kinda metal, like so:
The air that was wintry cold
waxed on a sudden hot as the breath of a burning mountain, and Gro
was near choking with the smell of soot and the smell of brimstone.
And the chamber rocked as a ship riding in a swell with the wind
against the tide. But the King, steadying himself against the table
and clutching the edge of it till the veins on his lean hand seemed
nigh to bursting, cried on short breaths and with an altered voice,
“By these figures drawn and by these spells enchanted, by the
unction of wolf and salamander, by the unblest sign of Cancer now
leaning to the sun, and by the fiery heart of Scorpio that flameth in
this hour on night's meridian, thou art my thrall and instrument.
Abase thee and serve me, worm of the pit. Else will I by and by
summon out of ancient night intelligences and dominations mightier
far than thou, and they shall serve mine ends, and these shall they
chain with chains of quenchless fire and drag these from torment to
torment through the deep.”
So that's okay. But boy, it's sure not
a fleet-footed novel. You could fairly say that
it lumbers, I think (this is especially noticeable
when you read it back-to-back with Discworld novels). And it can get
pretty tedious, especially when it switches its focus to Witchland
politics and in-fighting (which, honestly, Eddison's prose style
sometimes renders borderline incomprehensible). Nor is the
world-building impressive. Eddison sure does mention a shitload of
warriors and countries that we neither know nor learn anything
whatsoever about; there's clearly an extent to which this was
influenced by the Iliad, but that has the excuse
of having been partially a quasi-historical record—no such
rationale here. Nor is any of it particularly coherent. You know
how in Tolkien, all the names feel authentically part of their
cultures because the man had painstakingly developed those cultures?
None of that here. The four main demon lords are named Juss,
Brandoch Daha, Spitfire, and Goldry Bluzco. Just try to tell me that
those look like they go together (nor, let me
note, do any of their barely-extant personalities do any work for
them). And check this out:
All the creatures of the
forest came to that feast, for they were without fear, having never
looked upon the face of man. Little tree-apes, and popinjays, and
titmouses, and coalmouses, and wrens, and gentle roundeyed lemurs,
and rabbits, and badgers, and dormice, and pied squirrels, and
beavers from the streams, and storks, and ravens, and bustards, and
wombats, and the spider-monkey and her baby at her breast . . . and
not these along, but fierce beasts of the woods and wildernesses: the
wild buffalo, the wolf, the tiger with monstrous paws, the bear, the
fiery-eyed unicorn, the elephant, the lion and she-lion in their
majesty, came to behold them in the firelight of the quiet glade.
WOMBATS! The thing is, this is
supposed to be at least a somewhat concrete world, and when you toss
this heterogeneous jumble of stuff into it, it just feels...jumbled
(I'd also like to note for the record that Eddison refers to a
crocodile as both a “fish” and a “serpent”).
Still, I was kind of on the fence about
this novel throughout most of the run-time. Because while it's
frequently dull, it also undeniably has its moments. But then I got
to the end and...well. So right, this is obviously heavily
influenced by Norse saga, so you have to expect a certain amount of
glory-of-war stuff, and I don't exactly hold it against the book,
although the violence and death does become a bit dispiriting. But
that is nothing to the ending, which is truly
beyond the pale: the Witchlanders have been exterminated, and it's
all sweetness and light for the demons. And there's this princess
who had helped them earlier who's visiting them and she's like, good
for you, enjoy your peaceful existences. And then the demon lords
start complaining, in a fashion that can only be described as
“whiny,” about how lame and boring everything is now and how no
one will know them for mighty deeds of war 'cause there are no more
worthy opponents. So this princess helps them out by praying to the
gods, and whaddaya know, the gods come through and resurrect all the
Witchlanders so the demons can have fun slaughtering them all again.
The novel ends as it began, with a Witchland messenger arriving at
the castle.
Whee. I'm sure all the regular
Demonland soldiers are simply thrilled that they
get to go through all this bullshit again for the benefit of their
rulers. One might sourly note that it's no goddamn surprise to learn
that unlike Tolkien, Eddison never actually saw combat. This would
be okay if it were presented as a tragedy, but it
really isn't. You might think that it is thematically related to the
“Ouroboros” thing—endless repetition, you know—but the book
sure doesn't build that theme, and in fact Ouroboros itself is never
described nor plays any significant part in the proceedings.
So no, while this book isn't as
annoying as The Wood Beyond the World, I still don't
recommend it at all. My favorite early-fantasy novel remains The
King of Elfland's Daughter, and I didn't exactly
love that one either. It's strange to me how
primitive such books all seem to be; sure,
fantasy might have been a new thing, but narrative
sophistication and coherence sure weren't. It's really no
wonder that Tolkien's the first fantasy writer
with contemporary currency; his predecessors were not, as far as I've
read, writing lost classics. Not much chance of me reading Eddison's
later novels, set in the same world.
Maybe there was some kind of commentary here about how great heroism (as classically envisioned) tends to require bad guys to fight with-- and so while peace is theroretically good, it's kind of a double-edged sword for these people when you really think about the implications. It's been pointed out that the Harry Potter world is going to be incredibly boring and ennui-inducing after the novels, since what with the characters' effortless magical lives, they really needed Voldemort in order to have anything to struggle towards. Watchmen also hinted at the sad absurdity of "super heroes" living in a world where they hardly had any super villains to go up against.
I'm sure you're substantially right, but it would've worked better for me if Eddison hadn't seemed to take the attitude that this really WAS an awesome turn of events, to be celebrated.