Flann O'Brien, The Dalkey Archive (1964)
...so naturally, this, O'Brien's final
novel, was the one I was really keen on reading,
and not just because it's the namesake of my favorite publisher so I
really ought to, oughtn't I? There's also the
fact that it seems to harken back to the zaniness The Third
Policeman, even if it doesn't have the same reputation as
that masterpiece. Well, let's see.
So the protagonist is a fellow named
Mick, who, with his friend Hackett, comes across a strange individual
named De Selby, who--yes!--is the crackpot scientist the narrator in
The Third Policeman was obsessed with (though in
that book, he never actually appeared). He is allegedly able to
manipulate time, and he has a plan to destroy all life on Earth due
to Earth people and civilization being generally bad. Also, there's
a magic underwater cave where he goes to talk to the ghosts of
Christian church elders (he takes Mick and Hackett with him to meet
Saint Augustine). Also, there are eccentric policemen who are
borrowed from The Third Policeman, as is the idea
of human/bicycle hybrids. Oh, and also, he meets James Joyce,
accounts of whose death were greatly exaggerated.
So far so good. This stuff all sounds
like the ingredients for a corker of a novel. But...I have to say, I
think the conventional wisdom is on the money in this case. It's
fine, more or less, but the satire feels plodding and labored in a
way it never did in O'Brien's best novels. Look at the bicycle
thing, for instance: it was perfect in the
surreal, vaguely sinister context of The Third
Policeman, but here it feels kind of awkward and doesn't
really fit in with anything. This may be representative of the whole
novel. The plot, too, is ragged as anything: both the De Selby and
Joyce businesses are rife with potential, and both of them end up
feeling like jokes without punchlines. Again: not bad,
but a disappointing end to a career that began so blindingly.
And now...jeez, man, as big a fan as I
am of Dalkey Archive the publisher, I have to take them to task for
the back cover copy, which reads, in part:
James Joyce turns up alive and well,
serving drinks in an Irish pub and claiming that Ulysses was only a
practical joke. St. Augustine is interrogated in an underwater cave,
where he announces: "I was a man that was very easily sunburnt."
Though a mad scientist named De Selby is bent on destroying the
human race, Mick and Hackett--the only men who can save us--are too
preoccupied with the lovely Mary to concentrate on foiling him.
Okay...so the first sentence is okay as
far as it goes, though it'll give you a slightly misleading idea of
the Joyce situation. But that second one...JEEZ. Yes, at one point
he SAYS the indicated sentence, but there's actual context
when he says it. It's not, as this would indicate, just something he
comes up with out of nothing in a LOL RANDOM kind of way. And as for
Mick and Hackett being "preoccupied:" NO. First, it's not
some kind of love triangle; Hackett isn't involved. And second, at
no point does Mick's colleen get in the way of any world-saving that
is to be done. Whoever wrote this just made that up in the apparent
belief that it would make the book sound more wacky. Dammit. You
gotta be better than this, anonymous back-cover-copywriter!