Christine Brooke-Rose, Such (1966)
...and so, I narrowly avoid getting
through the year having read only books by dudes. To be clear, it's
not that I specifically read this with an eye towards getting a token
woman on the list; it was quite random. I just thought reading more
Brooke-Rose would be a good thing. I dunno, man. I don't
feel sexist. But here we are. Well, I think I've
probably already hashed
this out as much as needs must.
So here's This is
the novel for which Brooke-Rose won the James Tait Black Memorial
Prize. Good for her. And my goodness is it
abstruse. I mean, Out, the other Brooke-Rose
novel I've read,was too, but this is more so. How can I describe it?
So it begings with a protagonist waking up and escaping from a
coffin with the help of a woman. She is only referred to as
"Something," he "Someone." It's not at all clear
what's happening. They have children named Dippermouth, Gutbucket,
Tin Roof, Potato, and Really who are presented as kind of surrealist
creations. Dipperhead has a clock for a head.
Aah! What's happening?!? This is
driving me insane! Well, it turns out it's not just
an exercise in weirdness. Should I, uh, "spoil" it? I
dunno; I feel like with a book like this, you really want to read it
yourself and see what you get out of it without interference. But
what the hell. It turns out that Someone--who does
have an actual name--is an astrophysicist-turned-psychiatrist who had
some sort of near-death experience screwing up his perceptions. His
wife and children are actual people who appear as actual people, and
the whole thing is his experiences filtered through his own trauma
and also the language and concepts of astrophysics. Does that make
sense? No? No.
I mean, it does,
kind of, but it's definitely one of those books where you have to be
okay with not knowing what the hell is going on for long sections,
and also one that you're gonna have to read multiple times to
understand. I love that such an opaque novel could win a prestigious
prize like that. And I liked the novel itself, and I'm definitely
going to read more of Brooke-Rose, god willing and the creek don't
rise. Experiences like this are essential. You can't just mess
around with the same old thing! You must stretch your mind!
Otherwise, why even call yourself human? You might as well be a
mound of dirt! Or, god forbid, a republican!
I have this fantasy about teaching a
class that consists of nothing but the most baffling, confusing
books. This goes in, and Caliban's Filibuster.
Probably something by Sorrentino. Also Robbe-Grillet, whom I have
yet to read but I think would probably be perfect. Can I get every
student to drop the class before the end of the semester? If not,
the survivors are Guaranteed Rad, and I will buy them t-shirts to
that effect. Anyway.
So your class would be nothing but baffling, confusing books? I can imagine teaching a class where all students are easy to follow novels or perhaps old literally classics that are hard to read now but where consider page turners back in their day... but nothing but baffling and confusing reads? That's just silly!