Racist things are not racist because I don't associate them with racism.
How would you like it if I changed this
blog's format to
all-people-who've-said-crazy-things-on-my-facebook-feed, all the
time? Does that sound good? Actually, they don't usually do that.
People criticize facebook on all kinds of bases, but honestly, I find
it to be a generally pleasant place. I'm not friends with people who
have awful politics (or if I am, they keep it to themselves), so
basically, it's just people I like and posts from Disney-comics
groups I follow. It's fine. The only potential problem is the
occasional temptation to get into arguments with other people's awful
friends who comment on their posts, but I know full well that this is
the most stupid and futile thing I could possibly do on the internet,
so I never do it.
Well, anyway, still. There's this dude
I'm friends with. I don't know him particularly well; just someone I
sometimes saw in the company of other friends when I was in my
Doctoral program. He has a PhD in music theory and perfectly
conventional liberal politics, as far as I've been able to tell.
Certainly not a stupid person. Which is why it was so friggin'
bizarre to see him having a truly spectacular meltdown on the subject
of the Cleveland Indians deciding to de-emphasize their
cringe-inducing logo. He started by writing--to paraphrase--"it's
funny how all the people happy about this change have probably never
even gone to an Indians game or can name any players." The
relevance of this was...not clear, but as became apparent in the
trainwreck of a comments thread, the real issue was that he had all
kinds of nostalgic memories wrapped up in the team, racist mascot and
all, he saw any criticism of it as some sort of personal attack, and
he believed that because he personally did not associate the logo
with actual Native Americans, it was not racist. Truly an
impressively sub-rational display. Apparently he realized how awful
the whole thing looked, because he ended up deleting the thread, but
then he made ANOTHER post really emphasizing the whole nostalgia
thing and how his dad used to take him to games and now his dad is
dead [and has been for nineteen years, mind; this isn't a recent psychic wound that would make this sort of thing understandable] and SCREW YOU for calling him racist (which I don't think anyone
had actually done, but WHATEVER) (he also deleted a comment on this
post which--seemingly with no awareness of the, uh, issues
here--characterized Native Americans objecting to Chief Wahoo as
"uppity." With friends like these...).
Anyway, there's no real point to this
beyond GOOD LORD people are crazy. Even people you have every reason
to think AREN'T crazy.
We're all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad. You must be or you wouldn’t have come here.
[and has been for nineteen years, mind; this isn't a recent psychic wound that would make this sort of thing understandable]
Well to be fair, the death of someone so close to you is arguably an indescribably horrible thing, and it may be seen as sort of shallow to assume that any amount of years put between you and the event can fully heal any ensuing "psychic wound". This is obviously the case for most people, and lucky them, but that doesn't make it "unrightful" to continue grieving basically forever.
(Mark that I was just objecting to that particular sentence. There is no argument that the rest of your post is blatantly right: the poor chap just had an inexplicable lapse of nostalgia-induced irrationality, and that's that.)